The big march in London – Second anniversary of the Brexit vote


       SATURDAY 23RD JUNE, 2018

Set off from Carlisle Place at 2pm Carlisle Place is round the corner from Victoria Station, and will continue to Horseferry Road,  which brings you out to Lambeth Bridge.  The March will then continue down Millbank alongside the river to Parliament.  So if you would rather meet halfway, take a look at the route. Main march to Millbank near House of Lords people should be at Victoria for 1pm.

If you are unable to walk that length by the river towards Parliament, then please join us further along the route or meet at the  House of Lords where there will be speeches.  17 speakers including Gerard Batten, Anne Marie Waters, Robin Horsfall ex SAS  and Janice Atkinson, MEP and some surprise speakers to be announced on the day.

Bruges Group event – the future of Britain and the EU

The Future of Britain and the EUThe Bruges Group spearheaded the intellectual battle to win a vote to leave the EU and, above all,
against the emergence of a centralised European state.

Bruges Group Meeting
Tuesday, 19th June
6.45pm for 7pm
Brexit: the Future
The challenge, the opportunities and delivering a real Brexit

With the speakers; Nadine Dorries MP, Graham Stringer MP & Dr Ruth Lea

The speakers;
Nadine Dorries MP
Member of Parliament for Mid Bedfordshire, novelist and broadcaster

Graham Stringer MP
Labour Member of Parliament for Blackley and Broughton and scientist


Dr Ruth Lea
Author, economist and broadcaster


£10 payable on the door or in advance
Including wine, orange juice, mineral water and nibbles

To purchase your ticket visit:
Or call Robert Oulds on 020 7287 4414
or reply to this e-mail

Alternatively, click here for a form to book your place

Lectures: 7pm – 8pm
Discussion: 8pm – 8.30pm
Wine and refreshments: 8.30pm – 10pm

Princess Alexandra Hall, Royal Over-Seas League
Over-Seas House, 6 Park Place, St James’s Street
London SW1A 1LR

Click here for more information

Fisheries Brexit Meeting and Debate – Lowestoft

This Friday (the 16th) a seminal, high profile Meeting and Q&A session is being held in Lowestoft hosted by BFP Eastern.

From 1200 in The Orbis Centre, Wilde Street, Lowestoft, NR32 1XH

Local MPs, UKIP Fisheries Spokesman Mike Hookem, Director of the Marine Management Organisation Phil Haslam and local Councillors will all be in attendance.

FFL has been at the forefront of leading the industry and highlighting the major issues regards Brexit.

After successfully attending a previous invitation to Lowestoft in October, Fishing for Leave have been kindly invited to attend and look forward to outlining and answering questions on our position.

We look forward to showing the way ahead and taking on the NFFO in a debate regarding Brexit and the future of the industry.

This event will be one of the major policy debates on an industry that will be one of the acid tests and key players in Brexit.

We look forward to seeing you there.

Further details 07827 399 408

The EU: Some personal reflections

“Brexit means Brexit”, we are constantly told, but what does “EU” mean? Here, to give us some insight into what we had actually been signed up for in the Treaty of Rome and subsequent treaties is the Chairman of the Campaign for an Independent Britain.

Edward Spalton describes himself as “not very political – country corn merchant and family feed milling business”, who was mildly europhilic until the arrival of the European Agricultural Policy in 1972. What made him change his mind? In his talk, he will give some personal reflections on the origins and development of the European Union, the ‘Weltanschauung’ driving it and living independently alongside it. And he will give a world preview of a new video ‘Witness to History – An insider’s view from the Foreign Office of 1950”. After a break, he will lead a discussion on “An amicable divorce – why breaking up is so hard!”

Labour’s Brexit dilemma

Before the EU referendum, many people thought that the outcome, whatever it might be going to be, was going to cause far more problems for the Conservative than the Labour Party. At least up to now, this is far from what has happened. Only one Tory MP, Kenneth Clark voted against Article 50 on 2nd February 2017 while 47 Labour MPs voted that way, showing how deep the divisions within the Labour Party over Brexit are at the moment.

A number of key statistics tell the story. Of the 230 odd constituencies held by Labour at the time of the EU referendum, 70% had Leave majorities. If London and a small number of university cities are excluded, the ratio rises to about 90%. Some of these Leave majorities were very substantial. In Stoke on Trent, where one of the recent bye-elections was held, the Leave majority was close to 70%. Among Parliamentary Labour Party members, however, the picture is very different. There is still only a comparatively small minority of committed Leave supporters, and most of the seats with the largest Remain majorities had Labour MPs.

This is what has caused the Labour Party such huge difficulties. Clearly there was a democratic vote in favour of leaving the EU on 23rd June 2017 which needs to be respected. Many Labour MPs who were both personally strongly for Remain and who had substantial majority support for this position among their constituency electorates, however, thought that they had good reasons, in their judgement, for voting against Article 50.

The danger then is that the Party as a whole loses out heavily in the country at large because of its ambivalent stance on Brexit – and more polling evidence emphasises the scale of this risk. On the one hand, of the 9.3m people who voted Labour in the 2015 general election, just short of 3.5m voted Leave in the EU referendum and half of these people, about 1.7m of them, say that they do not intend to vote Labour again at least partly because they are unhappy with Labour’s policies towards the EU. At the other end of the spectrum, fervent Labour-leaning Remain voters are concerned enough about Labour supporting Article 50 to desert the Party and to vote for the Lib Dems, which is clearly what happened in the recent Richmond by-election at the beginning of December 2016, where Labour finished up with only 4% of the vote.

Labour is thus threatened with losing large numbers of votes both among its industrial heartland blue collar erstwhile supporters, because it is not Eurosceptic enough, as well as from metropolitan middle class people, many of whom do not want to leave the EU at all.  Of course, issues to do with Brexit are not the only reason why the Party is in difficulties, but Brexit is currently dominating political discussion in the UK at the moment, and Labour cannot afford to call this issue wrongly. So what can it do?

The by-elections held on 23rd February 2017 provide some guidelines. In both Copeland and Stoke Central Labour’s share of the vote fell. Obviously, other factors were in play apart from Brexit but both the loss of the seat by Labour in Copeland and the low turnout in Stoke suggest that many Labour-leaning voters away from London and university cities are upset by the Labour Party’s lack of enthusiasm for Brexit.

Furthermore, even though there was some good news from a Labour perspective, this needs to be treated with caution. The threat from UKIP turned out to be much weaker than might have been expected, no doubt mainly because the Conservatives have promised to do much of what UKIP supporters want. Nor did either the Lib Dems or the Greens do well. The problem Labour faces, however, is that, as the main opposition party, it has to win support back from the government and this is not what is currently happening. Instead, it seems that the Conservatives have been much more successful on Brexit in positioning themselves where the country wants to be.

What, in these circumstances can Labour do? Really, there is only one way ahead on Brexit which has any realistic chance of helping it to recover the electoral support it needs to become an effective opposition, let alone the party of government. It cannot afford to disregard the result of the EU referendum both for democratic reasons and because the Party stands to lose much more support from those alienated by Labour backing off supporting Brexit than it is likely to lose by failing to obstruct the Brexit negotiations, which has to be Lib Dem and not Labour territory.

What Labour needs to do, therefore, is to recognise that it has to accept the referendum result and then to play as constructive a role as it can on the Brexit negotiations. This will not be secured by tactical manoeuvring against the government. It will be achieved by supporting the government wherever it is acting in the national interest, while no doubt carving out a distinctive Labour position where there is genuine difference of view, for example of social legislation. 

Brexit is all too likely to dominate the political horizon for all the period running up to the next general election in 2020. Labour needs to use this period to rebuild the electorate’s trust in the Party on the EU – as well as much else.

Photo by DavidMartynHunt